Loading
Official Round: Completed

LifeCLEF 2022 Plant

Image-based plant identification at global scale

2568
98
0
92

Note: Do not forget to read the Rules section on this page. Pressing the red Participate button leads you to a page where you have to agree with those rules. You will not be able to submit any results before agreeing with the rules.

Note: Before trying to submit results, read the Submission instructions section on this page.

Motivation

It is estimated that there are more than 300,000 species of vascular plants in the world. Increasing our knowledge of these species is of paramount importance for the development of human civilization (agriculture, construction, pharmacopoeia, etc.), especially in the context of the biodiversity crisis. However, the burden of systematic plant identification by human experts strongly penalizes the aggregation of new data and knowledge. Since then, automatic identification has made considerable progress in recent years as highlighted during all previous editions of PlantCLEF. Deep learning techniques now seem mature enough to address the ultimate but realistic problem of global identification of plant biodiversity in spite of many problems that the data may present (a huge number of classes, very strongly unbalanced classes, partially erroneous identifications, duplications, variable visual quality, diversity of visual contents such as photos or herbarium sheets, etc). The PlantCLEF2022 challenge edition proposes to take a step in this direction by tackling a multi-image (and metadata) classification problem with a very large number of classes (80k plant species).

Data

The training dataset that will be used this year can be distinguished in 2 main categories: "trusted" and "web" (i.e. with or without species labels provided and checked by human experts), totaling 4M images on 80k classes.

The "trusted" training dataset is based on a selection of more than 2.9M images covering 80k plant species shared and collected mainly by GBIF (and EOL to a lesser extent). These images come mainly from academic sources (museums, universities, national institutions) and collaborative platforms such as inaturalist or Pl@ntNet, implying a fairly high certainty of determination quality. Nowadays, many more photographs are available on these platforms for a few thousand species, but the number of images has been globally limited to around 100 images per species, favouring types of views adapted to the identification of plants (close-ups of flowers, fruits, leaves, trunks, ...), in order to not unbalance the classes and to not explode the size of the training dataset.

In contrast, the second data set is based on a collection of web images provided by search engines Google and Bing. This initial collection of several million images suffers however from a significant rate of species identification errors and a massive presence of duplicates and images less adapted for visual identification of plants (herbariums, landscapes, microscopic views...), or even off-topic (portrait photos of botanists, maps, graphs, other kingdoms of the living, manufactured objects, ...). The initial collection has been then semi-automatically revised to drastically reduce the number of these irrelevant pictures and to maximise, as for the trusted dataset, close-ups of flowers, fruits, leaves, trunks, etc. The "web" dataset finally contains about 1.1 million images covering around 57k species..

Lastly, the test set will be a set of tens of thousands pictures verified by world class experts related to various regions of the world and taxonomic groups.


As soon as the data is released it will be available under the "Resources" tab.


Challenge description

The task will be evaluated as a plant species retrieval task based on multi-image plant observations from the test set. The goal will be to retrieve the correct plant species among the top results of a ranked list of species returned by the evaluated system. The participants will first have access to the training set and a few months later, they will be provided with the whole test set. 

Submission instructions

More practically, the run file to be submitted is a csv file (with semicolon separators) and has to contain as much lines as the number of predictions, each prediction being composed of an obsid (the identifier of a plant observation that can be itself composed of several images), a classid, a probability and a rank. Each line should have the following format: <obsid;classid;probability;rank>

Here is a short fake run example respecting this format for only 3 plant observations: fake_run

Due to the large number of plant observations in the test set, in order to limit the size of the run files, we ask the participants to limit the predictions to the 30 best results per observation (a maximum of 30 rows from rank 1 to 31 max for each plant observation).

Participants will be allowed to submit a maximum of 10 run files.


As soon as the submission is open, you will find a “Create Submission” button on this page (next to the tabs).


Before being allowed to submit your results, you have to first press the red participate button, which leads you to a page where you have to accept the challenge's rules.


Evaluation criteria:

The primary metrics used for the evaluation of the task will be the Mean Reciprocal Rank. The MRR is a statistic measure for evaluating any process that produces a list of possible responses to a sample of queries ordered by probability of correctness. The reciprocal rank of a query response is the multiplicative inverse of the rank of the first correct answer. The MRR is the average of the reciprocal ranks for the whole test set:

mrr-crowdai2.png

where |Q| is the total number of query occurrences in the test set. However, given the long tail of the data distribution, in order to compensate for species that would be underrepresented in the test set, we will use a macro-averaged version of the MRR (average MRR per species). 

 

Rules

LifeCLEF lab is part of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum: CLEF 2022. CLEF 2022 consists of independent peer-reviewed workshops on a broad range of challenges in the fields of multilingual and multimodal information access evaluation, and a set of benchmarking activities carried in various labs designed to test different aspects of mono and cross-language Information retrieval systems. More details about the conference can be found here.

Submitting a working note with the full description of the methods used in each run is mandatory. Any run that could not be reproduced thanks to its description in the working notes might be removed from the official publication of the results. Working notes are published within CEUR-WS proceedings, resulting in an assignment of an individual DOI (URN) and an indexing by many bibliography systems including DBLP. According to the CEUR-WS policies, a light review of the working notes will be conducted by LifeCLEF organizing committee to ensure quality. As an illustration,LifeCLEF 2021 working notes (task overviews and participant working notes) can be found within CLEF 2021 CEUR-WS proceedings.

Important

Participants of this challenge will automatically be registered at CLEF 2022. In order to be compliant with the CLEF registration requirements, please edit your profile by providing the following additional information:

  • First name

  • Last name

  • Affiliation

  • Address

  • City

  • Country

  • Regarding the username, please choose a name that represents your team.

This information will not be publicly visible and will be exclusively used to contact you and to send the registration data to CLEF, which is the main organizer of all CLEF labs

Results (16/05/2022)

A total of 8 participants submitted 45 runs. The results are encouraging despite the great difficulty of the challenge! Thanks again for all your efforts and your investment on this problem of great importance for a better knowledge of the biodiversity of plants.

Team run name Aicrowd name Filename MA-MRR
Mingle Xu Run 8 MingleXu submission_epoch80 0.62692
Mingle Xu Run 7 MingleXu submission_epoch77 0.62497
Mingle Xu Run 6 MingleXu submission_epoch67 0.61632
Neuon AI Run 7 neuon_ai 7_trusted_with_trusted_and_web_inceptionres_inception_ens 0.60781
Neuon AI Run 3 neuon_ai 3_trusted_and_web_inceptionres_inception_ens 0.60583
Neuon AI Run 4 neuon_ai 4_trusted_with_trusted_and_web_inceptionres_inception_ens 0.60381
Neuon AI Run 9 neuon_ai 9_trusted_with_trusted_and_web_inceptionres_inception_ens 0.60301
Mingle Xu Run 5 MingleXu submission_epoch49 0.60219
Neuon AI Run 8 neuon_ai 8_trusted_with_trusted_and_web_inceptionres_inception_ens_pretained 0.60113
Neuon AI Run 5 neuon_ai 5_trusted_and_web_inceptionres_inception_ens_triplet_dictionary 0.59892
Neuon AI Run 6 neuon_ai 6_trusted_with_trusted_and_web_inceptionres_ens 0.58874
Mingle Xu Run 4 MingleXu submission_epoch24 0.58110
Mingle Xu Run 3 MingleXu submission_epoch15 0.56772
Mingle Xu Run 2 MingleXu submission 0.55865
Neuon AI Run 2 neuon_ai 2_trusted_inceptionres_inception_ens 0.55358
Neuon AI Run 1 neuon_ai 1_trusted_inceptionres_5_labels 0.54613
Chans Temple Run 10 Chans_Temple_1 rs34n50e_attempt_lookup_ip_agg 0.51043
Chans Temple Run 9 Chans_Temple_1 rs34e_attempt_lookup_ip_agg 0.49994
Chans Temple Run 7 Chans_Temple_1 naive_attempt_lookup_i_agg 0.49075
Chans Temple Run 6 Chans_Temple_1 naive_attempt_lookup_agg 0.48804
Chans Temple Run 3 Chans_Temple_1 naive_attempt_lookup_agg 0.48804
Chans Temple Run 2 Chans_Temple_1 naive_attempt 0.48661
Chans Temple Run 8 Chans_Temple_1 hydra_attempt_lookup_i_agg 0.47447
Chans Temple Run 4 Chans_Temple_1 naive_attempt_logit_agg 0.47034
Bio Machina Run 5 BioMachina results-resnet50-webpretrained-trusted-epoch25 0.46010
Bio Machina Run 6 BioMachina resnet101-epoch=7-step=180424-web.trusted 0.45011
Bio Machina Run 7 BioMachina resnet101-epoch=10-step=248083-web-trusted 0.44910
Bio Machina Run 3 BioMachina results-3 0.43820
Bio Machina Run 2 BioMachina results 0.43813
Bio Machina Run 4 BioMachina results-resnet50-webpretrained-trusted-epoch10 0.43606
Bio Machina Run 1 BioMachina best_supr_hefficientnet_b4-ds=trusted-epoch=15-train_loss=1.81-train_acc=0.57--val_loss=2.33-val_acc=0.49 0.41950
Bio Machina Run 8 BioMachina results 0.41240
Chans Temple Run 1 Chans_Temple_1 sanity_baseline 0.00036
klssncse Run 1 klssncse output 0.00029
Chans Temple Run 5 Chans_Temple_1 naive_attempt_lookup_i_agg 0.00019
klssncse Run 3 klssncse submission-kl 0.00018
SVJ-SSN-CSE Run 3 SVJ-SSN-CSE res_final 0.00015
WeSeePlants Run 1 WeSeePlants FinalResult 0.00007
klssncse Run 2 klssncse FinalSubmission_File 0.00005
SVJ-SSN-CSE Run 1 SVJ-SSN-CSE res 0.00005
klssncse Run 4 klssncse submission-kl 0.00003
SSN Lekshmi Run 1 SSN_Lekshmi submission-kl 0.00003
Mingle Xu Run 1 MingleXu results 0.00003
SVJ-SSN-CSE Run 2 SVJ-SSN-CSE res 0.00000

plantclef2022results

CEUR Working Notes

For detailed instructions, please refer to http://clef2022.clef-initiative.eu/index.php?page=Pages/instructions_for_authors.html
A summary of the most important points:

 

  • All participating teams with at least one graded submission, regardless of the score, should submit a CEUR working notes paper.
  • Submission of reports is done through EasyChair – please make absolutely sure that the author (names and order), title, and affiliation information you provide in EasyChair match the submitted PDF exactly
  • Strict deadline for Working Notes Papers: 27 May 2022
  • Strict deadline for CEUR-WS Camera Ready Working Notes Papers: 1 July 2022
  • Templates are available here
  • Working Notes Papers should cite both the LifeCLEF 2022 overview paper as well as the PlantCLEF task overview paper, citation information will be added in the Citations section below as soon as the titles have been finalized.

 

Schedule

  • Jan 2022: registration opens for all LifeCLEF challenges
  • 15 February 2022: training data release
  • beginning of April 2022: test data release and opening of the submission system
  • 15 May 2022: closing the submission system and release of processed results by the task organizers (online)
  • 27 May 2022: deadline for submission of working notes papers by the participants
  • 13 June 2022: notification of acceptance of working note papers [CEUR-WS proceedings]
  • 1 July 022: camera ready working notes papers of participants and organizers
  • 5-9 Sept 2022: CLEF 2022 Università di Bologna

Citations

Information will be posted after the challenge ends.

Prizes

Cloud credit

The winner of each of the challenge will be offered a cloud credit grant of 5k USD as part of Microsoft’s AI for earth program.

Publication

LifeCLEF 2022 is an evaluation campaign that is being organized as part of the CLEF initiative labs. The campaign offers several research tasks that welcome participation from teams around the world. The results of the campaign appear in the working notes proceedings, published by CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org). Selected contributions among the participants, will be invited for publication in the following year in the Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) together with the annual lab overviews.

Resources

Contact us

Discussion Forum

Alternative channels

We strongly encourage you to use the public channels mentioned above for communications between the participants and the organizers. In extreme cases, if there are any queries or comments that you would like to make using a private communication channel, then you can send us an email at :

  • herve [dot] goeau [at] cirad [dot] fr
  • pierre [dot] bonnet [at] cirad [dot] fr
  • alexis [dot] joly [at] inria [dot] fr

More information

You can find additional information on the challenge here: https://www.imageclef.org/PlantCLEF2022

Participants