
Location
Badges
Activity
Challenge Categories
Challenges Entered
What data should you label to get the most value for your money?
Latest submissions
Machine Learning for detection of early onset of Alzheimers
Latest submissions
See All| graded | 145471 | ||
| graded | 145458 | ||
| graded | 145420 |
Play in a realistic insurance market, compete for profit!
Latest submissions
See All| graded | 125508 | ||
| graded | 125497 | ||
| graded | 125493 |
5 Problems 21 Days. Can you solve it all?
Latest submissions
See All| graded | 124827 | ||
| graded | 124826 | ||
| graded | 124825 |
5 Puzzles 21 Days. Can you solve it all?
Latest submissions
5 Puzzles, 3 Weeks | Can you solve them all?
Latest submissions
Predict the winner through prior chess moves
Latest submissions
See All| graded | 124827 | ||
| graded | 124826 | ||
| graded | 124825 |
| Participant | Rating |
|---|
| Participant | Rating |
|---|
ADDI Alzheimers Detection Challenge
Do you trust your Leaderboard Score?
Over 4 years agoHi @moto ,
Just curious, your best submission (the one kept in the private LB) is it Python or R? 
Motivation from the submission history
Over 4 years agoHi @Johnowhitaker,
Thank you for the graph. Did you use 3-digits submissions logloss? My feeling is that the shape will be quite different with no rounded results.
And it made me think: what would happen if more than 10 participants reach the top? (as there are 10 prizes).
Fictive example:
- 1 โ 0.590
- 2 โ 0.594
- 3 โ 0.598
- 4 to 8 โ 0.600
- 9 to 12 โ 0.601
Random variable(s)
Over 4 years agoHi,
I edited my notebook by adding new sections, and one of them is โRandomโ
.
When I build a model, I always add a random variable (from uniform distribution) to detect useless variables. I consider that all variables ranked under the random one are explaining noise. So I remove them
, and run a simpler and faster model
. As these variables were rarely used by the model, predictions and performances are very similar (but always a little lower
). But the model is easier to implement.
Here, the rank is 39 !

It mean I should remove a lot of variables
. I tested it: 2 successive models, one with all variables (LB logloss: 0.6136) and one with only 38 variables (LB logloss: 0.6147). Very similar โฆ
My feeling, and it was already discuss in a different post, is that random play a strong part in our submissions. Results and ranks will (randomly?) change on the 40% hidden dataset.
What do you think ? ![]()
Not able to edit an existing notebook
Over 4 years agoI just tested with โuploadโ and it worked!
Thank you.
I could now edit and add some new stuffs in the notebook.
Not able to edit an existing notebook
Over 4 years agoI tested both.
Initially, using colab link didnโt work, thatโs why I tested to download the file and upload it (and it worked). But now that I want to edit it, even the upload way doesnโt work. I will try today again.
Do you trust your Leaderboard Score?
Over 4 years agoI hope youโll invite me for a game if you win the playstation 
Do you trust your Leaderboard Score?
Over 4 years agoThankโs. Donโt hesitate to like it
, this will increase my chance for the Community Price, even if I participated lately.
For the R notebook, you have to install R in order to see โR kernelโ at the top right of your notebook.
Not able to edit an existing notebook
Over 4 years agoHi,
I shared a notebook yesterday, by uploading a .ipynb file downloaded from Google Colab. It edited this Colab, download it again, and try to edit the notebook, but I got the following error:
โUnable to process the notebook. Check the file and try againโ.
I tried with the file that worked yesterday, and I got the same error. I tried several time, on Edge and Chrome.
Do you know what could happen? Thanks in advance.
Add a 4th class?
Over 4 years agoYou probably noticed in the dataset some โnormalโ observations with very strange clocks
(less than 4 digits, no hands, etc.). In the training dataset, itโs almost 50% of โnormalโ observations.
One assumption is that these patients are affected by a disease
which is not Alzheimer (Parkinson, Lewy-body, โฆ), so considered as โnormalโ in our classification puzzle.
Sharing this particularity to the model
could be helpful โฆ I tried to split the main class in 2:
- โtrue normalโ
- โanormalโ
Do you trust your Leaderboard Score?
Over 4 years agoInteresting discussion!
I was working on a notebook that shares some throughs similar of yours @etnemelc . I am convinced that most of the time I managed to improve my leaderboard score (from 0.610 to 0.606), I was overfitting this specific dataset. The difference are so little, it could clearly be noise, especially on โsmallโ datasets like those.
I agree with you @michael_bordeleau, I wonder if observations came from the same source. I find the split in number of observations (33,000 for the train, 362 for test and 1,500 for leaderboard) really intriguing โฆ is it to make the competition harder, or is there a reason behind? Iโm curious to see.
Validation Set
Over 4 years agoYou can.
https://discourse.aicrowd.com/t/combination-of-train-and-validation-set-and-even-test-set/5696
๐ Welcome to the ADDI Alzheimer's Detection Challenge!
Over 4 years agochange your username for โbordeleau_michaelโ โฆ

FastAI Starter Notebook and Class Balance
Over 4 years agoExcellent notebook, thank you for sharing!
One point that makes me think, is the size of test dataset (only 362 obs.), meaning significant variability of the criteria. Some logloss of your notebook are so closed, they could be considered as similar, with no guarantee order will stay the same on leaderboard. I experimented it, with a model that decrease test dataset logloss (while never seen it), but increase leaderboard one โฆ 
My feeling is that current top 10 are the ones, as @no_name_no_data said, that slight overfit leaderboard dataset.
I am curious to see our this will evolve, I hope some participants will found tricks that generally reduce logloss.
Not able to get starter notebook
Over 4 years agoHi,
I followed the instructions of several discussions, and the first lines of code seem to work (no warning nor error). I managed to download aicrowd.R file, to download and load R libraries, load the datasets and made some explorations.
But I got an error when I tried to linked with my Aicrowd account.
aicrowd_login(AICROWD_API_KEY)
running command โฆ had status 1
I copy-paste directly from my aicrowd page, so I donโt think I made an error. Do you know what could be the problem?
Load model
Over 4 years agoHi,
Just to be sure I correctly understand: we donโt have access to the test dataset (the one used for Leaderboard, that contains 1,473 rows), even its features, right? Our model will be loaded and applied on it?
Thank you.
Did anyone get R to work?
Over 4 years agoHi,
I followed the instructions shared by @michael_bordeleau, and the first lines of code seem to work (no warning nor error). I managed to download aicrowd.R file.
I canโt reach CRAN url to download a library, but I can load already installed ones, load the datasets and made some explorations.
But I got an error when I tried to linked with my Aicrowd account.
aicrowd_login(AICROWD_API_KEY)
running command โฆ had status 1
I copy-paste directly from my aicrowd page, so I donโt think I made an error. Do you know what could be the problem?
Common issues for Windows users
Over 4 years agoHi,
I managed to open the R starter notebook (in Jupyter, on Windows VM), but I got a warning message at the first line of code, which is:
cat(system('curl -sL โฆ
I didnโt edit the code, just click on โRunโ.
The warning is:
aicrowd.R had status 6
is it normal? it generates an error at the next chunk, when trying to source this aicrowd.R file.
Not able to get starter notebook
Over 4 years agoHi,
I am on a Windows VM, I managed following the first steps :
- open Linux VM to manually copy train.csv and valid.csv in the folder โfiles/โ
- install Anaconda
- change proxy
- install r packages (I would like to work with R)
But I canโt manage the next step which is to copy the starter notebook. I get the following error:
โcpโ is not recognized as an internal or external command
Do you know what I missed?
Thank you in advance,
AI Blitz #6
๐ Explained, by Community | $100 x 2 Cash Prizes
Over 4 years agoHi all,
Do you have updates on these Community prices?
@vrv 
Notebooks
-
R you normal? (explore datapoints + xgboost training 0.606) Challenges reflections and r xgboost approachdemarsylvainยท Over 4 years ago -
Work in progress about video transcriptions Capture images from video and compare them to identify movesdemarsylvainยท Almost 5 years ago -
Learn from started code Using started codes shared by admin and improve accuracy for the image classifier problemsdemarsylvainยท Almost 5 years ago
Sharing Best submissions
Over 4 years agoHi all,
This competition was great
, and even itโs over, iโm still curious about what other participants have done 
. Is your best submission (kept in the private LB) the one you expected? Do you think you find a feature others didnโt think about? Did you test ensemble models or other approaches?
Mine (20th position) is a quite simple R xgboost with:
and weightings giving the following distribution (using all observations of both training and test datasets):
About feature engineering
, I gather several variables with mean and sum, like most of you probably. Maybe one feature (with good ranking) we never talk about it, is the ratio between the minute hand and the average distance from centre of the digits:
ratio_hand_Xi = minute_hand_length / mean_dist_from_cen__Kudos to the organizers, and congrats to all winners and contributors!