Tentative Winner Announcement

Thanks, @snehananavati ! When is the final official announcement expected?
Will the current rankings/groups remain the same and only validation phase left to make sure the submission valid?
imho this would help the finalists gain confidence in registering and arranging for the conference.

View post 0

The Web Conf Announcement

Hi Sneha, How many presenters are covered by the travel grant? Does each registration apply to only one presenter?

View post 0

Challenge Announcement

Hi Sneha, we have already granted repo access to all the emails, but we recently received an email stating that the invitation was declined. Is this okay?

View post 0

‼️ ✍️ Important: Submission Documentation Guidelines

I agree with Kaushik. Each contestant’s pipeline is still evolving up to the deadline. The documentation submission needs to be set a few days after the leaderboard locks for better assurance.

View post 1

I need to say this

Wow. What a clickbait-y title. But that got your attention

I haven’t properly said it before, but Thank you Zew and Aicrowd for organizing this competition. Thank you, fellow participants. I learn lots of new stuff from this, especially from the top LB solutions & other participants’ notebooks. I think I already got in my mind the best practice when facing this kind of problem in my work in the near future (sooner or later I think I’ll be facing this too, and labeling will be more expensive because of engineer/scientist level labeler needed for the data).

Hope you guys are always in good health.

Cheers

View post 4

:rotating_light: Select submissions for final evaluation

Hi @dipam , just need a little clarifications about your post :

The detailed steps are given below:

1. Eligible teams will select two of their submissions to evaluate - Eligibility criteria to be announced soon, it will be based on Round 2 leaderboard.
2. Each submission will run through the pre-train and the purchase phase on the end of competition dataset.
3. The same purchased labels will be put through 5 training pipelines - Details to be released soon.
4. Each training pipeline will be run for 2 seeds and scores averaged, to address any stochasticity in scores.
5. To avoid issues due to difference of average scores from different training pipelines, a Borda ranking system will be used.

while the 5 training pipelines results scored using Borda ranking system, how about the submissions? is it the highest score from the submission that is being used or is it an average from both submission results?

View post 0

Simple Way to know any defect on image, finding noisy label, etc using OpenCV

Hi guys, I made a notebook about a simple method to detect defects on images using OpenCV.
It really helps me in detecting noisy labels and adding extra strategies on selecting which data to buy/skip.

you can read it here: AIcrowd | Simple Way to Detect Noisy Label with opencv | Posts

Hope it helps with your training or buying strategy too!
Also pls leave some likes if you don’t mind!

View post 1

📹 Town Hall Recording & Resources from top participants

I tried this locally too!
but still beaten by buying naive prediction on dent label

View post 2

Need Clarification for Round 2

Hi AIcrowd Team, just want to clarify something :

1. In the post-purchase training phase,

# Create a runtime instance of the purchased dataset with the right labels
purchased_dataset = instantiate_purchased_dataset(unlabelled_dataset, purchased_labels)
aggregated_dataset = torch.utils.data.ConcatDataset(
    [training_dataset, purchased_dataset]
)
print("Training Dataset Size : ", len(training_dataset))
print("Purchased Dataset Size : ", len(purchased_dataset))
print("Aggregataed Dataset Size : ", len(aggregated_dataset))

DEBUG_MODE = os.getenv("AICROWD_DEBUG_MODE", False)
if DEBUG_MODE:
    TRAINER_CLASS = ZEWDPCDebugTrainer
else:
    TRAINER_CLASS = ZEWDPCTrainer

trainer = ZEWDPCTrainer(num_classes=6, use_pretrained=True)
trainer.train(
    training_dataset, num_epochs=10, validation_percentage=0.1, batch_size=5
)

y_pred = trainer.predict(val_dataset)
y_true = val_dataset_gt._get_all_labels()

shouldn’t it be something like this?

trainer.train(
    aggregated_dataset , num_epochs=10, validation_percentage=0.1, batch_size=5
)

2. Because the combined and different time budget, shouldn’t it be something like this?
   
   

   revise1920×958 86.6 KB

instead of the original diagram?

orig734×366 28.2 KB

or did I assume it wrong?

Thanks.

View post 1

Brainstorming On Augmentations

1. I just want to make it more versatile to any augmentation pipeline I want to use. or maybe that’s the incorrect way? Does anyone else mess with the dataset classes only me? (asking the others)

2. I deleted it to show the result “my way” of training the random pick one from scratch.
   My main pipeline is consist of pretraining, using the model to select purchases, resetting the weight then train it from scratch. I don’t think pretraining won’t do anything helpful if I want to do that.

3. I think reproducing is supposed to be doing the same and using the same thing. so probably just like you guess or the maybe seed. thanks for the indirect suggestion I’ll try to add every method from here Reproducibility — PyTorch 1.10 documentation

4. sorry for that I guess?

hi @shivam , sorry to drag you in, just to make sure are there any specific rules about only using a certain way in making the solution (like class, code writing, ml pipelines, frameworks, save path, etc)?

View post 1

Brainstorming On Augmentations

Yep.
At first, I tried feeding both the raw + pre-processed ones but it gives a really bad score.
probably because different way of convnet learns from those two types of images.
now I go either using the pre-processed only or raw only.

the seismic challenge while back, the rms attribute does help scale the amplitude. while the raw doesn’t really help me. Apparently, it’s quite different now while the raw can perform well too, the pre-trained weight also helps significantly.

View post 1

Brainstorming On Augmentations

I’m only using :

• RandomHorizontalFlip,
• RandomVerticalFlip,
• RandomRotation,

you can see it on my notebook here :

I don’t use any color augmentation at all because some of my current high submissions came from using no raw image input (though I still run some experiments on raw input one in case the preprocess one hit the ceiling, the same experience from the seismic competition before with @santiactis )

View post 1

Experiments with “unlabelled” data

yes, it’s very significant.

From my experiment notebook its something like this :

the notebook :

View post 1

My Multiple Experiments Results ( the random one got 0.88 on LB)

Here’s my multiple experiment results score that I log into tables.

I’m using this same parameter for each experiment :

model : efficienet-b1
input: raw image
epoch: 20
optim: Adam

tl;dr, use augmentation and pre-trained weight.

I hope you it help you guys, especially for those who just joined.

View post 2

Size of Datasets

what’s your comment about this @shivam ?
I think it’s 5000 training images, 3000 to purchase, 3000 to test right? just as in the overview.

View post 0

Full list of available pretrained weights

wow, which pytorch version that got vit? nightly version?

View post 0

Submit failed with no error log

yes, it should be like that but mine didn’t show up.

View post 0

What is this validation submission phase error log means?

==================================
Deleting unsupported pre-trained model: ./.cache/pip/wheels/76/ee/9c/36bfe3e079df99acf5ae57f4e3464ff2771b34447d6d2f2148/gym-0.21.0-py3-none-any.whl
Deleting unsupported pre-trained model: ./.cache/pip/http/1/3/0/c/a/130ca645ced2b235e6f69505044bb4923f610dbb4bc6c8e1d76a50bb
Deleting unsupported pre-trained model: ./.cache/pip/http/8/f/8/e/b/8f8eb31d64d7424ab679aad519c22a7bf4f40ab17d1c4bad52b49a9c
Deleting unsupported pre-trained model: ./.cache/pip/http/a/d/c/0/3/adc03ed04ad13ffdeee3c838911d25a9f3659c9e3590f34fa6bf3a7e
Deleting unsupported pre-trained model: ./.git/objects/pack/pack-c148ae0f71d82068775278a3044e1a3c25b5f4a3.pack
Time left: 10800
timeout: the monitored command dumped core
/home/aicrowd/run.sh: line 38:    61 Segmentation fault      timeout -s 9 $AICROWD_TIMEOUT_INFO python aicrowd_client/launcher.py

View post 0

Submit failed with no error log

I got error in the “Validate Submission” phase but with no log too

View post 0

🚀 Discussion on Starter Kit

hi @vrv ,

I tried using this submission method instead : AIcrowd
the push works, checked it on gitlab, but somehow it’s not on the submission. the tag `submission-`` prefix is right too. Any idea why?

View post 0